The 2008 Parkinson's Unity Walk Funds Research Grants
Through the generous support of its corporate sponsors, 100% of all donations made to the Parkinson's Unity Walk are distributed among the major U.S. Parkinson's disease foundations for Parkinson's disease research. The foundations include: (1) the American Parkinson Disease Association; (2) the National Parkinson Foundation; (3) the Parkinson's Action Network; (4) the Parkinson's Disease Foundation; (5) The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research; (6) The Parkinson Alliance; and (7) The Parkinson's Institute and Clinical Center.
We are excited to share with you information about the following grants —all of which are made possible from 2008 Parkinson's Unity Walk distributions. We will update the grants with progress reports as they are made available to us. In September 2009, updates to several grants were provided to us. Those updates are indicated below in red.
|
1. American Parkinson Disease Association is using its distribution to fund:
September 2009 Project Update: Revelance to Parkinson’s disease: More pertinent information was obtained on the use of a knockout mouse experimental model for the study of PD. Project Title: Bilateral Clinical and Neurophysiological Effects of Unilateral STN DBS in PD September 2009 Project Update: Results: The author has determined that MEG recordings can be obtained in a patient with PD with unilateral STN DBS deactivated and activated at clinically effective settings utilizing Near Source Subtraction techniques. Additionally MEG used to measure a somatosensory evoked field in a PD patient with unilateral STN DBS activated at therapeutic settings suggest that the somatosensory evoked field was not altered in a systematic or artifactual way by continuous activity of the brain stimulator.
September 2009 Project Update: Results: It seems that rotenone potentiates NMDA currents by a tyrosine kinase-dependent process that attenuates voltage-dependent Mg2+ block of NMDA-gated channels. These results are now “in press” in the journal Neurotoxicology. Revelance to Parkison’s disease: The proposed research may help define oxidative mechanisms that increase the risk of Parkinson’s disease.
September 2009 Project Update: Results: The scientist has confirmed that these cells harbor a homozygous inactivating PINK1 gene deletion and completely lack expression of functional PINK1 transcripts, whereas heterozygous PINK1 knockout cells express about 63% of the normal PINK1 mRNA levels when compared to wildtype cells. Revelance to Parkinson’s disease: These findings will help to understand which aspects of mitochondrial function are affected in familial PD, and accelerate the development of strategies to boost mitochondrial function as a potential novel therapy for PD in the future. |
|
2. National Parkinson Foundation is using its distribution to fund the following: Project Title: Behavioral and Neural Deficits of Reversal Learning as a Model for Impulse Control Disorders in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease September 2009 Project Update: Objective:• To determine whether Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with impulse control disorders (ICD; this cohort is PD-ICD) exhibit behavioral impairments of reversal learning, compared to PD patients without ICD (PD-control), we examined reaction time, skin conductance and heart rate data • To investigate whether the mesocorticolimbic circuitry mediating reversal learning is disrupted in PD-ICD patients, compared to PD-control patients, we examined the functional imaging data • To evaluate for anatomical changes between PD-ICD and PD-control groups, particularly within limbic circuits including: orbitofrontal, cingulate, insula and amygdala regions • Examine the structural imaging data Background: PD is associated with a high prevalence of impulse control disorders. Recent data suggest that PD patients are impaired on tasks of reversal learning, in which they need to inhibit (“reverse”) learned response tendencies. We have hypothesized that PD-ICD patients have further functional disruptions and subtle structural changes in meso-cortico-limbic brain circuits associated with reversal learning mechanisms. Results from the proposed studies will lead to a better understanding of the functional and structural neural underpinnings of ICD in PD. Methods/Design: We originally proposed to recruit 24 subjects: 12 PD-ICD and 12 PD-control. Over the 2 years of the grant we have screened 109 subjects. We identified 18 PD-ICD and 9/18 were scanned. The rest of the PD-ICD subjects either required immediate adjustment of dopaminergic therapy based on the intensity of ICD (2), had resolution of ICD by the time of scanning (2), declined participation (4), or did not fit in the scanner (1). We also scanned 12 PD-control subjects. Out of 21 completed scans, one of the PD-control subjects was later determined to have had a history of ICD and was excluded from the analysis. Results: As this is a non-treatment study, outcomes are relative to achieving the objectives and data analysis. The study did not confirm our original hypothesis of abnormalities within the mesocorticolimbic reward circuitry in Parkinson's patients with impulse control disorders. However, we note there were a number of limitations to the study design that may have impacted on our results. These limitations include design of study as a classical conditioning paradigm as well as the small number of subjects in the study. Conclusion/Relevance to Parkinson’s Disease: Although the results did not confirm our hypothesis, these pilot data do suggest that mechanisms outside of mesocorticolimbic circuitry may be playing a role in impulse control disorders in PD. For example, studies have suggested that sensorimotor cortices may be involved in habit formation and compulsive behaviors (Brewer and Potenza, 2008), which may relate to the structural abnormalities seen in PD-ICD patients. Thus, the study was helpful for generating alternative hypotheses for future investigations of ICD in Parkinson's disease.
Background: Do widely available medications have the potential to be neuroprotective treatments for Parkinson’s disease (PD)? Calcium channel antagonists, anti-inflammatory medications, and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) all have properties which address mechanisms of cell injury in PD. The over-arching hypothesis of this proposal is that these commonly prescribed medications do have the potential to be protective treatments for PD.
Results: We created a meta-analytic database from 7 PSG/NET-PD studies. The database includes 2,365 unique subjects and 2,514 person-years of observation. The initial analysis examined the effect of one type of calcium channel blockers. There was no effect observed on UPDRS progression with significant overlap between change scores for exposed and unexposed individuals (p=0.79). Interpretation of results is limited by lower-than-expected exposure to brain penetrant calcium channel blockers in the study database (approximately 3% of subjects). Conclusion/Relevance to Parkinson’s Disease: This negative result provides insight into mechanisms of PD progression. As the drugs in this study seem not to have provided a substantial neuroprotective result, any future proposed model for PD will have to reflect this reality. This result casts doubt on a set of proposed mechanisms for PD progression and, in doing so, advances the theories that do not suggest improvement in the presence of the investigated calcium channel blockers.
September 2009 Project Update: Objective: In this grant we examined the relationship between inflammation, as measured by fibrinogen levels, and Parkinson’s disease (PD). The first phase of the project will be to develop curricula for PD patients that will focus on building resiliency using the principles of CBT. This curriculum will be first tested in an 8 week series for patients. Using refinements from the evaluation of the first 8-week session we will offer a second 8-week session and add a caregiver companion program that will meet separately but at the same time as the patient group. Overall, the program will be evaluated for the feasibility of group intervention, subjective benefits to participants, and practicality of dissemination to a larger population of PD patients and caregivers. September 2009 Project Update: Objective: This project proposed to test the feasibility of a group cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) intervention for people with depression and PD. CBT is based on the concept that a person can be taught to change their attitude and thereby reduce the perceived distress related to their disease and situation and is considered a best practice for depression.Background: Depression is the most common non-motor problem in Parkinson’s disease and is associated with increased disability, decreased quality of life (QOL), and increased caregiver strain independent from motor symptoms. In spite of this, it is often unrecognized and untreated. Antidepressant therapy has been insufficient for patients with PD. Nonpharmacological interventions designed specifically for PD are limited. Methods/Design: The first phase of the project developed curricula for PD patients that focused on building resiliency using the principles of CBT. This curriculum was first tested in an 8 week series for patients. Using refinements from the evaluation of the first 8-week session we offered a second 8-week session and added a caregiver companion program that met separately but at the same time as the patient group. Overall, the program was evaluated for the feasibility of group intervention, subjective benefits to participants, and practicality of dissemination to a larger population of PD patients and caregivers. Results: The group intervention proved logistically feasible and went smoothly. The curriculum developed was well received. Caregivers were interested in the companion program and were receptive to the content. Conclusion/Relevance to Parkinson’s Disease: Depression is a common and debilitating non-motor symptom of Parkinson’s disease. As group CBT proved feasible in this small setting, the next step is to contrast its effectiveness with other therapies employed clinically. There is clearly a need for further research on group CBT in comparison with other therapies to evaluate both the short and long-term effectiveness. Several factors suggest group CBT as offering a potential long-term benefit. |
|
3. Parkinson's Action Network (PAN), founded in 1991, is the unified education and advocacy voice of the Parkinson's community, fighting for a cure. Through education and interaction with the Parkinson's community, scientists, lawmakers, opinion leaders, and the public at large, PAN works to increase awareness about Parkinson's disease and advocates for increased federal support for Parkinson's research. PAN also provides the information and resources necessary to empower people with Parkinson's disease to act on their own behalf and gain a greater sense of control over their health and their future. For more information on PAN, please see its website at www.parkinsonsaction.org. |
|
4. Parkinson’s Disease Foundation is using its distribution to fund the following: Project Title: Combining fast scan cyclic voltammetry and tetrode ensemble recording in a rat model of Parkinson's Disease September 2009 Project Update: Project Title: Properties and adaptations of the subthalamopallidal synapse in mouse models of Parkinson’s Disease September 2009 Project Update:
Project Title: Identification of a novel gene for Parkinson’s Disease |
|
5. The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research is using its distribution to fund the following: Target Validation Initiative and the Clinical Intervention Awards. The Target Validation Initiative is designed to accelerate the rate at which new Parkinson's therapies are brought to market. Target Validation provides awards of up to $250,000 to validate the therapeutic potential of scientific discoveries and push them one step closer to the clinic. While research continues to identify new genetic, cellular and biological targets for therapeutic intervention to benefit PD patients, the translation of these discoveries into practical treatments requires additional applied work. Target Validation funds this work with the ultimate goal of ‘de-risking’ potential investment in the most promising targets by biotech and pharmaceutical companies, who are generally best-suited to carry promising therapies forward into the clinic. For a complete list of projects that were awarded grants under the Target Validation Initiative and Clinical Intervention Awards, please visit the website of The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research. |
|
6. The Parkinson Alliance is using its distribution to fund the following: Project Title: Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) on Balance Control Methods/Design: Thirty subjects with PD have been randomized into DBS surgery either in the STN or GPi. They will be tested a few days before DBS surgery, while on levodopa and off levodopa, as well as 6-months after surgery under 4 conditions: off both DBS and levodopa, on levodopa alone, on DBS alone, and on both levodopa and DBS. Two control groups will also be tested at baseline and 6 months later: 1) subjects with PD who choose not to get DBS surgery and 2) age-matched controls without PD. Step initiation and balance strategies in response to computerized surface perturbations will be quantified with forces under the feet, body motion and muscle activation patterns. We will determine if changes in gait and balance after surgery, compared to before surgery, differ compared to gait and balance changes across 6 months in subjects with PD who have not had surgery and compare effects of DBS in the two sites. November 2009 Project Update: Our research indicates that deep brain stimulation in people with Parkinson’s disease does not improve their ability to initiate voluntary movements or to quickly react to balance disturbances.
This award from The Parkinson Alliance will help support work in the creation of animal models and in the production of novel viral vectors. Lay Description Of The Burke Laboratory |
|
7. The Parkinson’s Institute and Clinical Center is using its distribution to fund the following: Project Title: Epidemiologic Studies of PD Etiology September 2009 Project Update: Results: We found that the risk of Parkinson’s disease was significantly lower in cigarette smokers than in non-smokers. Similarly, risk was lower in coffee drinkers than non-drinkers. Looking at the interplay between genes and environment, we found extremely strong interactions between common variants in the gene coding for alpha-synuclein and mild head injury. Although several genetic variants have previously been shown to slightly increase Parkinson’s disease risk, and mild head injury may modestly increase risk, the combination of these two factors dramatically increased risk by 11-fold. Furthermore, the head injuries occurred on average 30 years before the onset of Parkinson’s disease. Relevance to Parkinson’s disease: Although the combined “interacting” effects of genes and environment factors have long been suspected as the cause of most Parkinson’s disease, only a handful of studies have ever identified any specific factors. Mild head injuries can cause persistent inflammatory responses in the brain, and they are extremely common, occurring in 10-20% of the population. Because the injuries occurred several decades prior to Parkinson’s disease onset, this provides hope that if started early, protective medications could help to prevent future Parkinson’s disease in susceptible individuals.
|